Lol - iPhones since the iPhone 8 have been Qi compatible and this is a Qi pad.
Sorry man, but having this charger engineered only to work with the most common models (5.8-6.1" phones) without having a adjustable ledge/multiple coils inside to meet the needs of the other variants (5.4"-6.8") is, indeed, a design flaw.
Right from the listing: “*Note: This item is compatible with all wireless charging phones,”
Look at the Apple approved design. I have a flat charger as they intended. You can make a ledge for it (might look ghetto) or grumble. Or you can go to the bother to return - it’s all up to you. Since this is Woot, you may have to pay for return shipping unless you purchased via Prime.
I prefer plug in as it is more energy efficient by typically 15 to 20%. Some Qi chargers from even “name brand” companies are fire hazards due to design.
My experience and reading was prior returns at least without purchase via Prime had a less than friendly RMA process compared to Amazon. As stated, he MAY need to pay for return shipping. Meaning he may not. It’s still is a hassle.
I have a Qi charger. I don’t use it because of what I read about energy transfer efficiency and warming. See above for detailed reasons why.
The UL Listed seal means that the product has been tested by UL to nationally recognized safety and sustainability standards. Additionally, it has been found to be free from a reasonably foreseeable risk of fire, electric shock in a Division 2 environment.
Respectfully this is a cut and paste quote: Sure sounds like the cost of shipping is deducted out of any refund if the item is “not damaged or defective.” If the item is not broken and functions fine, cost of shipping sure sounds like it is removed from any refunded amount. Amazon differs. They pay cost of shipping. In some low cost cases, they said, don’t even send it back and credited full amount.