Dyson DC24 All-Floors Vacuum

[theguruguys]

@sdc100

Basically, they thought that it was more form than function.

Isn’t that Dyson in a nutshell?

[masshuum]

@sdc100

In a sidebar where they report on unusual items or features, Consumer Reports called the ball mechanism a gimmick. It’s not that it didn’t work, but rather, many cheaper and better performing vacuums were just as maneuverable using conventional technologies. Basically, they thought that it was more form than function.

Well, the way they advertise it makes it obvious how gimmicky it is.

I don’t know about anyone else but I’ve never had the inclination to race my vacuum cleaner around my house (except maybe when I was 6…) As such, I don’t care how “well” it handles “corners”. I’m not doing laps, if anything I’m continually parallel parking the vacuum cleaner sans obstacles. I’ve never seen anyone not do the back and forth dance with a vacuum, except - of course - on Dyson commercials that praise the “ball”.

Sounds like from the reviews that no questions asked, the Shark vacuum that Woot sells from time to time is far better than THIS version of Dyson.

[StatiK]

@theguruguys

Isn’t that Dyson in a nutshell?

No, that’s Apple.

[theguruguys]

@StatiK

No, that’s Apple.

Someone should do a study on how many Apple owners also own Dyson products.

[Gatzby]

@masshuum

I don’t know about anyone else but I’ve never had the inclination to race my vacuum cleaner around my house…

Man, you ain’t even lived.

[Buck_Futter]

This item sucks… Enough with the effing vacuums.

[daguava]

Does Dyson just have such a large problem selling their vacuums that they have to hand them off to woot?

[djames42]

@masshuum

Well, the way they advertise it makes it obvious how gimmicky it is.

The ball is no gimmick. Perhaps some of you don’t care how well your vacuum handles corners and love getting an extra workout while you suck, but I love being able to make it around furniture with the twist of my wrist.

@lunarc

I have had this vacuum for about two years, and honestly, it is junk. I would never recommend this thing, in the time we have had it, the plastic pieces are wearing out quickly, the peddle to fold the Dyson to operation mode is very flimsy, and the cap to attach the hose has come off.

The cord is way too short and the suction on this thing is pathetic…

Odd - I’ve had this vacuum for about four years, and I love it. Maybe my DC24 is different than yours, but all the pieces are still together (although I’ll give you that the pedal is so flimsy that I’m surprised it hasn’t broken yet), and the cord is long enough to do an entire floor without having to move outlets. Then again, perhaps my measly house is no match for your mansion

[cheftwolfe]

@djames42

Odd - I’ve had this vacuum for about four years, and I love it. Maybe my DC24 is different than yours, but all the pieces are still together (although I’ll give you that the pedal is so flimsy that I’m surprised it hasn’t broken yet), and the cord is long enough to do an entire floor without having to move outlets. Then again, perhaps my measly house is no match for your mansion

Your email, that you had said was pretty funny, I am on the same page with you, I dont have a mansion neither, and the dyson does what I need also

[Hamstur]

@sdc100

FYI, rumors have been flying around for years that using Dyson vacuums will void your carpet’s warranty. Apparently, the beater brushes are extra rough on the fibers. Only one or two companies specifically forbids Dyson in their warranty, i.e. Unique Carpets LTD, but many carpet sellers and cleaners tell buyers to avoid Dysons. Do a Google search on “dyson carpet void warranty.” I don’t know if this is mere rumor, but it’s something to consider.

Don’t you post this every time a Dyson is up? Very well, I will respond as I have before: The concern is really only in regard to wool carpets potentially being damaged by vacuums with overly-vigorous brush bars. Dyson is apparently thought to have a very aggressive brush action. If you don’t have wool carpets, there’s no issue. I note that the manual for this model indicates that one can turn off the brush.

[showcaller]

@emccoyii

Honestly… Why don’t we just have a WOOT page devoted to nothing but vacuum cleaners?

Great idea, I think it should be along the lines of the old Mickey Mouse Club - the original one. Monday could be Vacuum Cleaner day, Tuesday could Dell day, Wednesday could be two for tuesday, oh wait,better not mess with that, Tuesday will be two for Tuesday day, Wednesday will be Dell day, Thursday will be LCD Television day and Friday will be wireless router day!

[losttime]

@lunarc

I have had this vacuum for about two years, and honestly, it is junk. I would never recommend this thing, in the time we have had it, the plastic pieces are wearing out quickly, the peddle to fold the Dyson to operation mode is very flimsy, and the cap to attach the hose has come off.

The cord is way too short and the suction on this thing is pathetic. It tends to push the stuff on our hardwood floors more than pick it up. It does work on rugs just fine, as long as the pile is not too high, if it is, the thing just turns off the brushes (for safety) and the suction is so weak it doesn’t do anything. I have heard better things about other models, but honestly I wish I just bought a Miele and called it a day.

I needs me a vacuum, but I guess I’ll hold off for the next round.

[showcaller]

@stockli

Excellent vacuum. Got ours off of Woot a few months ago, and I wonder how we ever got by without it. The amount of pet hair it pulls out of the carpet is just shocking. Runs very smoothly, and the canister is super easy to empty. Overall, couldn’t be more pleased with this unit. Highly recommended.

It’s comments like these that actually make me wonder if firms like Dyson make a model specifically for sale on Woot. Many firms like Nike make products specifically for the outlet mall store market that you are simply never going to find in one of their retail stores. Okay, back to my conspiracy theories.

[terminatorgir]

@theguruguys

Someone should do a study on how many Apple owners also own Dyson products.

Agreed, seems like the same demographic

[TalynOne]

Video comparing DC24 vs DC25:

Dyson DC24 vs DC25 Ball Vacuum Cleaner Comparison

[luk3d4wg]

I’m going to post this again: there are better vacuums than this, even at this price or less (Hoover Platinum, Bissell Cleanview, or even a cheap Tempo Widepath). If your vacuum budget is significantly higher, get a Miele instead.

I’ve owned both a Dyson and Miele and can say I wouldn’t recommend spending your money on a Dyson – they’re all hype.

Check out the full review:

http://www.ultraconsumer.com/?p=7

Edit: I should mention that the Dyson up for Woot this time is one of the most inferior models they produce (including the refurbished DC-14 that I owned).

[toybuilder]

I own a DC07, the “first” Dyson model. Bought it back in 2004, and it still works great. After about 5 years of continuous use, it started to smell like dogs whenever it was turned on – I eventually figured out that there was a lot of trapped dander in the cyclone that was slowly releasing over time. I dunked and sloshed the cyclone in the tub for about ten minutes, and problem solved!

As vac’s go, it’s the best I’ve had over the years…

[ummidunno]

i just wanna know a coupon code for free shipping or something. anybody got anything?

[DragoSanguinante]

@flynnerdsp

What’s the difference between this and the DC25?

About $100…

[DragoSanguinante]

@showcaller

It’s comments like these that actually make me wonder if firms like Dyson make a model specifically for sale on Woot. Many firms like Nike make products specifically for the outlet mall store market that you are simply never going to find in one of their retail stores. Okay, back to my conspiracy theories.

I can picture it now. “WOOT! Edition Dyson, vacuums up ONE great type of dirt item a day!” Maybe that’s not quite right…