I have one of these and it works great. Someone suggested ‘why dont you just use your flat bed scanner’
WELL when you have 200 pictures to scan its much easier to throw them in the plastic frame and into the scanner than open your scanner and set it just so and all that stuff.
1.What are the advantages and disadvantages of this compared to using a traditional scanner?
2.My family’s pictures from the 50s, 60s, and 70s certainly aren’t matte finish…does the “somewhat gloss” finish on them mean this machine wouldn’t be a good choice?
Scans them as far as i can tell. Kinda like a regular scanner but more convenient and maybe better. I’d be concerned about the “able to make a digital copy of any non-glossy picture” part though. Looks like no glossy photos.
I did a ton of old black and whites and they turned out perfect, although some of the sizes were off I made it work. I did accidently drop a picture inside but I used tweezers and got it out easy.
You know what sucks? Sitting here two time zones away, and reading the discussion board while debating whether or not to buy the netbook Woot has up. Then I decide “Sure, why not…”, return to the home page, and find this on there instead.
At first I thought “Wha? Another Woot off?”, but when I didn’t see the strobing lights I realized DUH… it’s midnight in Texas.
[face palm] Next time woot… next time.
The only real negative I can see with this product is having to do photos one at a time because you need to load them into the special tray. If you have a large album, it can be very time consuming. I’ve seen an HP Scanner that has a feeder which will do small stacks of photos in batches, but not for $43.
I think so. It doesn’t get more single pass than that. Which makes me wonder how well it will to with “glossy” (as opposed to “matte”) finished photos.