Men's Underwear: Fly or No Fly?
How else will we get around?
Pence would have preferred “no fly”
Nobody likes to go over the gate!
A fly is just going over the gate sideways…
(Turn screen 90 degrees for a demonstration)
needs a Superfly option!
Was going to post that only men should respond to this particular post for obvious reasons, but I can see how it could snowball into a conversation about recent abortion laws passing.
Why is “Kilt” not an option?
Edit: As in “Going Commando”
Um… same underwear under the kilt. Did you mean commando?
Yes. It’s still early for me. Thanks for reading my addled mind
Hint. It’s not underwear for men without a fly.
If men’s underwear don’t have a fly then aren’t they just panties?
Jump the fence.
The word “panties” has always chafed me (no pun intended) in the same way some dislike the word “moist.” The word is just… no. Ewww. To me, it is all just “underwear,” without regard to gender.
When I have flies on my underwear it’s time to take a shower.
I can’t remember the last time I actually used the fly on my undies… maybe when I was 12?? I just go over the top, it’s just quicker and easier.
Note: I always wear shorts, never pants. And I never have any reason to tuck my shirts in… ever.
The problem with flies are the feller can have a hard time getting tucked back in once the peeing is done. Sometimes you have to adjust the feller as well because it can get wedged in the fly opening. The fly is good for functionality but no fly is better for comfort. This is the last thing I thought I’d be writing about today!!