Did people actually pay $700 to look like a complete dork? Why? You can do so for much, much less.
3 Likes
Its not a medical. Its purely environmental. Its for pollutants.
3 Likes
I picture this as a montage where Iām walking around in slow-motion in an over-crowded city, and everyone else around me is living their lives at a normal speed.
2 Likes
4 stars? For this price I need at least 6 stars.
3 Likes
They want how much??
1 Like
the sales by hour chart is blocky enough to conclude that theyāve sold a grand total of TEN as of this writing.
Iām surprised that number is so high.
2 Likes
6 Likes
very smart people
2 Likes
Lol $420
4 Likes
Masks arent medical either. Proven
1 Like
Whatās with all the negative Nellies who clearly dont know a think aout Dyson quality.
Dyson is a cutting edge company that makes great products which are very often copied by inferior companies.
Get over yourself.
Iām sorry you cant afford it.
This is comedy gold
We need 2-3 more sentences to make this a copypasta.
3 Likes
So I have had some hands-on experience with these. The filtration works well enough in smoggy environments, but if you are in an even remotely smaller city, or are in any building that has acceptable air filtration, it really isnāt worth it. Sound is where these fall apart. They sound mediocre at best, and can be beat by a pair of $200 cans if really trying. Harsh upper range on all profiles, so you are getting a lot of sibilance. Most notably, there is absolutely NO advanced codecs. No LDAC or aptX, and for the price, absolutely a hard-pass.
Graphs if you care: Dyson Zone - Official Thread - Official Headphone Model Discussion - The HEADPHONE Community
9 Likes
Remember the Dyson electric car?
Yeah, me neither.
2 Likes
Vacuum and futuristic looking fan that functions , now they are space age innovators.
2 Likes
The video is more insightful than my tone belied.
3 Likes
Just any mask will not do. Cloth masks attenuate microdroplets < 65% (individual viruses are not spewed - they are carried in saliva and mucus). N-95 work far better and are what we distributed to all staff and to Patients who had active respiratory illness. This strictly adhered to policy even if Patient was alone in exam room, kept my staff safer 29 months. All exposures (contract traced and PCR) tested and tracked for 2 weeks) - if all persons including the Patient were in N-95 masks - resulted in no Patient to staff or staff to staff transmission for that period. All cases were family member to staff with no spread to immediate co-workers.
Actual test data that was cited by Linsey Marr, PhD, internationally respected researcher on environmental engineering who did her own landmark in-lab filtration studies:
- 1 person with surgical mask: ~50% protection
- 2 people with surgical mask: ~75% protection
- 1 person with N95/KN95/KF94: 90+% protection
- 2 people with N95/KN95/KF94: 99% protection ā what we did starting late Feb 2020 (even before Fauci and the CDC did a poor job educating the public).
6 Likes
Thank you.
1 Like
Explains a lot.