Parrot Zik or Zik 2.0 Wireless Headphone

[wootstalkerbot]

[Preview 1][Preview 2][Preview 3][Preview 4][Preview 5][Preview 6][Preview 7]

Parrot Zik or Zik 2.0 Wireless Headphone
Price: $54.99 - 79.99
Shipping Options:: $5 Standard (Free with Prime)
Shipping Estimates: Ships in 3-5 business days (Monday, Mar 05 to Thursday, Mar 08) + transit
Condition: Factory Reconditioned

[http://www.wootstalker.com/images/buy.png

Buy It](Parrot Zik or Zik 2.0 Wireless Headphone) [http://www.wootstalker.com/images/amazon.png

Search Amazon](http://www.amazon.com/s/?field-keywords=Parrot Zik or Zik 2.0 Wireless Headphone) [http://www.wootstalker.com/images/google.png

Search Google](Parrot - Google Shopping Zik or Zik 2.0 Wireless Headphone)

[dgale72]

Microphone?

[00ashap00]

@dgale72

Microphone?

Yes, there is mic, pretty good, btw.

[Raziel66]

These are really solid headphones and the audio quality and microphones are awesome! One thing to watch out for though are the ear cups. There’s a widespread issue with the 2.0s where the inner lining separates from the padding and exposes the foam. I had to send mine in after a few months to get a replacement.

[vwtick]

@Raziel66

These are really solid headphones and the audio quality and microphones are awesome! One thing to watch out for though are the ear cups. There’s a widespread issue with the 2.0s where the inner lining separates from the padding and exposes the foam. I had to send mine in after a few months to get a replacement.

So are the replacement pads better?
Since these are refurbs I would assume the pads have been replaced already, maybe.

[ltang]

Interested…
For $25 difference, which one makes a better deal? Any experienced users here? Thanks!

[gallogj]

From all of the comparisons I’ve read…the Zik 2.0 are significantly better in almost every way. They are lighter, have a longer battery life, better noise cancelling, more microphones. The one con (which is significant to me) is that the Zik 2.0 has a inferior build quality. Many people have indicated that their ear cups fell apart within 3 months exposing the foam underneath. That’s a dealbreaker to me. I’m going with the original Zik’s for that reason. The Amazon reviews for those are much better.

[ltang]

Thanks, the original version then.

@gallogj

From all of the comparisons I’ve read…the Zik 2.0 are significantly better in almost every way. They are lighter, have a longer battery life, better noise cancelling, more microphones. The one con (which is significant to me) is that the Zik 2.0 has a inferior build quality. Many people have indicated that their ear cups fell apart within 3 months exposing the foam underneath. That’s a dealbreaker to me. I’m going with the original Zik’s for that reason. The Amazon reviews for those are much better.

[cayqel]

@ltang

Thanks, the original version then.

Plus the “parrot” on the 2.0s just looks bad

[jelainemiller]

@vwtick

So are the replacement pads better?
Since these are refurbs I would assume the pads have been replaced already, maybe.

Hoping this is the case.
Adds 2.0 to cart

[nikorami]

These are horrid pieces of junk! You will be paying for a paperweight!!

Worst purchase I have ever made on Woot…

[kctulsa]

I hope these headphones last because so far they are awesome. The sound is incredible. They are not worth $400 bucks, but they are certainly worth $87 bucks. The only complaint that I have is that there is a giant “E” stamped on the inside of the right ear pad. Anyone else have a big ass letter stamped on theirs?