Check the size chart!!! These are sized like Asian clothing, Large is only 34-36 waist instead of 36-38.
The 3XL is only a 40-42 waist; about 10 inches smaller than average American sizes
That’s what she said?
The only place where a 42 inch waist translates to a 3X is in “Lillyput”!
These are not Asian sizes , thes are U.S sizes, we created the size chart this way relative to the fit. It’s a modern fit so it’s not too loose and not too tight, so somebody who normally wears a waist size between 34-36 can but a size large and have a nice comfortable fit. You can size down for a slimmer fit or size up for a loose fit.
How deep are the pockets? TIA
They were actually designed to have pretty deep pockets , you can probably fit to iPhone Max’s in each pockets.
So if I wear a 40-32 jeans size, what would be the ideal size for a medium loose fit here?
I’m normally a medium in almost everything, and I went with a large based on the size chart. I’d want these to be a looser fit anyway, so I think I’m good.
I disagree, I recently was given some shirts from my grandfather that were circa early 90s. I typically wear 2XL shirts in today’s sizes and they can be occasionally snug, but these shirts were XL and they fit loosely. The sizes have changed.
I’m overweight. I buy fat lady clothes. I double check size charts on everything. I know what size I wear in most American brands. There is a trend with Asian brand clothes where I would need to buy a 5x or 6x, whereas I can wear 2x in American clothes. Some stuff on Woot runs smaller than most American clothing and trends closer to Asian sizing. It’s a thing petite people may not care about. Even at a healthy weight I would have to buy 2x in some stuff. Look at the disparity in sizing sometime and you might observe that we fat folks might know what we’re talking about. It isn’t about feeling the need to wear a certain letter. It’s about whether or not the pants will fit over the hips.
Do these have a fly? The photos could go either way.
No fly , it’s more comfortable without that fly.
Not if you’ve gotta pee really bad!
Where I come from these are called internet pants
I have some old XL basketball shorts from my highschool uniform. Maybe from the 60s or 70s. And those things are nut huggers, lemme tell ya. “Asian” sizes are probably just vintage American sizes.
WFH (Work from Home) pants fer sure. Though I suppose that’s optional too. If you use a camera make sure where you point that thing (the camera I mean…). Luckily our engineering group tends to not use cameras so I’m not sure they’re wearing anything at all. The sales and marketing types use their cameras though.
The size thing is a bit weird but this one is close enough to believe. I’m not sure I buy the marketing line. There was one product that had a Large as 32-34. That’s clearly not a normal US size. This one is a bit closer but something still doesn’t seem right.
I’m normally about Waist 38 and will order some XLs and hope for the best. I have had some things that were too big as XLs (not from this brand) and were just awkward how big they are. With this brand, at least according to the charts, I’m not sure XL will be big enough.
EDIT maybe the new name for “Lounge Pants” should be “WFH Pants?”
idk but what caught me off guard was inseam length… I’m short so decided to risk it lol
This sale was a scam. Was only a 2 pack not a 4 pack. They did the same with socks last week. Advertised as 18pr packs but only delivered 12 pair packs.
Where did they lose your pants? I ordered but haven’t been delivered yet.