[QUOTE=artbatter1, post:79, topic:239588]
Apparently it just stabilizes camcorders. It shouldn’t affect a camera.
[/quote]
Why would a camera be different than a camcorder? (Answer: it isn’t, though the head on this has a method of adjustment that is better for camcorders)
No, this is not a great tripod. I haven’t used this specific one, but I have had a couple similar ones in the past. The similar Sunpak I had worked fine for a year or so, but eventually the leg clamps loosened, and the tripod would collapse randomly. For the $35-40 I paid for that one, it did its job. For $11 shipped? You can’t complain.
You do’nt want to be using something like this on the edge of a 100’ cliff. A strong breeze will knock it over. Nor do you want to use it in a mission critical application where you desire perfect stability - something this light will vibrate a bit more than a better one, giving you a less sharp image (though still far, far better than handholding).
But it’ll work fine for light/casual use of a P&S, or handle a DSLR + plastic lens in non-stressful situations just fine. It could also be used for offboard flashes, reflectors, etc, though I prefer light stands for that sort of thing due to the smaller footprint and folded size - but even my cheap light stands were five times the price of this tripod.
If you’re looking for something to use with your small P&S, or a cheap travel tripod, give it a whirl. If you want something to stick 3lbs or more of camera on, spend a few bucks on a cheap Manfrotto with a nice ball head.
As others have noted, this is a 4’ model - and that’s probably with the center column fully extended. I probably wouldn’t use it with an SLR with that column extended. This will have somewhat limited use as it is quite short, but, be creative with placement, and note that oftentimes, a vantage point quite low to the ground can be interesting.
I won’t be getting this as it’d be redundant, but if I needed a cheapie tripod, I’d be all over it.